Friday, March 31, 2017

                                                     THEN THERE'RE THREE

"Nineteen year a prisoner of the law."

Jean Valjean 
Les Miserables

"You forgot I gave these also.
Would you leave the best behind?"

Mon Signor
Les Miserables


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgPcb2DM4Nc

Valjean's Soliloquy

The best way to sum up what we have so far about Christ is this:

"Despite some differences in thought and phrase and treatment, there is one essential Christology in the New Testament. ,,,"Jesus is Lord." "There is a unity in all these great Christian books" said James Denney in his greatest book, Jesus and The Gospel, "which is powerful enough to absorb and subdue their differences, and that unity is to be found in the common religious relation to Christ, a common debt to Him, a common sense that everything in the relations of God and man must be and is determined by Him."

 Achibald M. Hunter
The Message Of The New Testament

Hunter touches on it, expands on it in his small book.  Restate it again: "everything in the relations of God and man must be and is determined by him" i.e. Christ. So He will somehow be there in all things determining how they go.  But flesh has boundaries.  Ones given by God. For one obvious purpose.  To remind us always that we ARE NOT GOD.  That we are created and not Creator.  That all our marvels, from human  fire to the greatest skyscrapers have an end, from water on the fire to maniacs crashing into buildings with jet planes.

So, since we are not God and can not act as God, he left us a Helper to make things clear if we pay attention and listen.  

We keep mentioning Him.  He pops up again and again.  Jesus even died so we could know Him, have Him  with us all the time.  Because God misses walking in the Garden at the cool of the day with those He created and loves.   The Spirit refreshes our spirit and so the flesh.  So let's discuss the Holy Spirit.

He's there at creation moving on the waters.

Jesus walked with man in  the Garden and the Spirit was still.

He's there in the Pre-Flood world but seems not to be doing anything.  God the Father or the Son talks directly to two men.  Only a paltry few come out of the Deluge.

Pre-Law God as himself or Jesus talks with men.  The Spirit appears only at the sacrificial pact between  Abe and God, but really God and the Spirit:

Ge 15:1 After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward.
 2 And Abram said, Lord GOD, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?
 3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir.
 4 And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir.
 5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.
 6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
 7 And he said unto him, I am the LORD that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give thee this land to inherit it.
 8 And he said, Lord GOD, whereby shall I know that I shall inherit it?
 9 And he said unto him, Take me an heifer of three years old, and a she goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtledove, and a young pigeon.
 10 And he took unto him all these, and divided them in the midst, and laid each piece one against another: but the birds divided he not.
 11 And when the fowls came down upon the carcases, Abram drove them away.
 12 And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him.
 13 And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years;
 14 And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance.
 15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age.
 16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.
 17 And it came to pass, that, when the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between those pieces. {a burning...: Heb. a lamp of fire}
 18 In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:
 19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites,
 20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims,
 21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites.
 (KJV)

(Please notice that this is a LOT more land than we see Israel  occupies today and men are currently trying to take more land away by human treaty.)

Answer: A covenant is an agreement between two parties. There are two basic types of covenants: conditional and unconditional. A conditional or bilateral covenant is an agreement that is binding on both parties for its fulfillment. Both parties agree to fulfill certain conditions. If either party fails to meet their responsibilities, the covenant is broken and neither party has to fulfill the expectations of the covenant. An unconditional or unilateral covenant is an agreement between two parties, but only one of the two parties has to do something. Nothing is required of the other party.

The Abrahamic Covenant is an unconditional covenant. God made promises to Abraham that required nothing of Abraham. Genesis 15:18–21 describes a part of the Abrahamic Covenant, specifically dealing with the dimensions of the land God promised to Abraham and his descendants.

The actual Abrahamic Covenant is found in Genesis 12:1–3. The ceremony recorded in Genesis 15 indicates the unconditional nature of the covenant. The only time that both parties of a covenant would pass between the pieces of animals was when the fulfillment of the covenant was dependent upon both parties keeping commitments. Concerning the significance of God alone moving between the halves of the animals, it is to be noted that it is a smoking furnace and a flaming torch, representing God, not Abraham, which passed between the pieces. Such an act, it would seem, should be shared by both parties, but in this case God’s solitary action is doubtless to be explained by the fact that the covenant is principally a promise by God. He binds Himself to the covenant. God caused a sleep to fall upon Abraham so that he would not be able to pass between the two halves of the animals. Fulfillment of the covenant fell to God alone.


The writer forgets there are two Spiritual elements to God-Father and the Spirit.  The two fire sources indicate the Spirit and God both walked there.  In doing so,  He commits Himself fully to his covenant and the land, That huge chunk of real estate, becomes the promised inheritance.  This is vital to remember for Christians because this is the land of the eventual Millennial Kingdom.  We need to keep it in mind as we read on.  We will deal with End Times and prophecies related to them, but we must keep in mind that the plan and promise were laid out by God and the Holy Spirit was the part of Him committed to make sure these things came to pass.  He is the part of God who has operated in one way or another to bring all these things to pass.  We need to keep that in mind when others ask where Jesus was long before His birth.  He was part of the plan, there in some sort of flesh as we have considered.  He laid out the world and all things in it, but it has been his "brother" (Not the brother as Satan the angel gets interpreted by mistake) the Spirit who has been keeping God's commitment working tirelessly to bring everything to pass. As the Son stands as our redeemer and witness at God;s Right Hand.

When the treaty was made, the Spirit took  a more visible active role.  Make no mistake He could have any time, but God's design, Jesus intent to honor the Father, wanted him to wait so humanity could see how well it could do by itself without Him stepping in.

Recall that, after the fore fathers, the flaming bush appears to Moses:

Ex 3:1 Now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father in law, the priest of Midian: and he led the flock to the backside of the desert, and came to the mountain of God, even to Horeb.
 2 And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.
 3 And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.
 4 And when the LORD saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I.
 5 And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.
 6 Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.


The flame can be seen as the Holy Spirit also manifesting to Moses, so powerfully it makes him turn away.  That notion of the Spirit as fire appears throughout the Bible:


http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/fire/

Fire [N] [T] [E] [S]
One of the most arresting and suggestive metaphors in the Bible is that of fire, a phenomenon common to all cultures ancient and modern and one that lends itself to a variety of imagery. The most prevalent term for fire in the Hebrew Bible is es [vea]. The Greek word phos [fw'"], also normally rendered "light, " occurs a couple times in the New Testament as "fire" ( Mark 14:54 ; Luke 22:56 ). The usual word for fire in the New Testament is pur [pu'r], the regular Greek translation of Hebrew es [vea] in the Septuagint.

As a commonplace in ancient Israel, fire obviously is to be taken literally in most of the several hundred references to it in the Bible. Its figurative or theological attestations are also numerous, however, generally relating to some manifestation of God's being or action.

Fire, as theophany of existence, communicates, first of all, the very presence of God. This is especially evident in the burning bush from which God spoke to Moses ( Exod 3:2-6 ). Here fire is a manifestation of God himself, for Moses turned away from the sight "because he was afraid to look at God" (v. 6). Similar to this is Yahweh's descent upon Mount Sinai "in fire" ( Exod 19:18 ; cf. Deuteronomy 4:11-12 Deuteronomy 4:15 Deuteronomy 4:33 Deuteronomy 4:36 ). In the New Testament Paul describes the second coming of Christ as "in blazing fire" ( 2 Th 1:7 ), an appearance that carries overtones of judgment as well as mere presence. Also akin to Old Testament imagery is John's vision of Jesus with eyes "like blazing fire" ( Rev 1:14 ; 2:18 ; 19:12 ), again in judgment contexts.

It is not always possible to distinguish the presence of God from his glory for, indeed, glory is frequently a figure itself for divine presence. However, a number of passages focus on fire as synonymous with or in association with God's glory. For example, to the Israelites at Sinai "the glory of the Lord looked like a consuming fire" ( Exod 24:17 ; cf. Leviticus 9:23 Leviticus 9:24 ; Deut 5:24 ). In visions of God in his glory in both Old and New Testaments, fire is a regular phenomenon.

A special use of fire imagery in the New Testament is that connected with baptism with fire. John the Baptist predicted that Jesus would baptize "with the Holy Spirit and with fire" ( Matt 3:11 ; cf. Luke 3:16 ), a promise that was fulfilled on the day of Pentecost. Then "tongues of fire" rested upon those gathered in the upper room with the result that they "were filled with the Holy Spirit" ( Acts 2:3-4 ). The fire here is a manifestation of God, in the case of the Third Person of the Godhead, a theological conception unknown to the Old Testament.

Fire as theophany of action reveals God at work in a number of ways. One of the earliest and clearest of these ways is his appearance in a pillar of fire that led the people of Israel out of Egypt and through the Sinai deserts. Another instance of God's use of fire as an active manifestation of his presence is his sending fire from heaven to consume sacrifices offered up to him on special and unusual occasions. The first of these inaugurated Aaron's ministry as priest. Having blessed the people, Moses and Aaron witnessed the appearance of the glory of the Lord, a striking manifestation of which was fire that "came out from the presence of the Lord" to consume the sacrifices already placed on the altar ( Lev 9:23-24 ). Other examples of fire as the expression of God's acceptance of offerings are those of Gideon ( Judges 6:19-24 ) and of the father and mother of Samson ( Judges 13:15-20 ). In both cases Yahweh is present in the person of the angel who touches the altar, causing the sacrifices to erupt in flame.

Because of fire's heat and destructive capacity, it frequently appears in the Bible as a symbol of God's anger and of the judgment and destruction that sometimes are extensions of that anger. The psalmist employs fire as a simile for divine displeasure when he asks the Lord, "How long will your wrath burn like fire?" ( Psalm 89:46 ) Isaiah, referring to God's coming in judgment, sees him "coming with fire" and bringing down his rebuke "with flames of fire" (66:15). Jeremiah says in reference to the destruction of Jerusalem that Yahweh "poured out his wrath like fire" ( Lam 2:4 ). Ezekiel uses the term "fiery anger" to speak of God's outpoured judgment, especially when speaking of the impending Babylonian conquest ( 21:31 ; 22:31 ). This is also the language by which he describes the overthrow of Gog in the end times. In his "zeal and fiery wrath" he will bring about massive calamity ( 38:19 ).

In other passages, the anger of God is not only metaphorically represented by fire, but fire becomes a literal vehicle of his wrath. At Taberah in the Sinai desert Yahweh's "anger was aroused" and "fire from the Lord burned among" the people ( Num 11:1 ). And the rebellion of Korah and his followers also resulted in many of them perishing by fire, a manifestation of God's hot anger ( Num 16:35 ; 26:10 ; Lev 10:2 ). A most impressive display of fire as an instrument of judgment is the destruction of the messengers of Ahaziah of Israel who attempted to seize Elijah the prophet only to be struck with fire "from heaven" ( 2 Kings 1:10 2 Kings 1:12 2 Kings 1:14 ). This is probably an example of lightning, which otherwise is clearly a means of inflicting divine judgment and destruction (cf. Exod 9:23-24 ; Job 1:16 ; Psalm 18:13-14 ).

The same imagery of fire as a sign of God's anger and judgment continues in the New Testament. James and John asked Jesus whether or not they should invoke fire from heaven in order to destroy the Samaritans ( Luke 9:54 ). Paul speaks of fire as a purifying agent capable of testing the quality of one's life and works ( 1 Cor 3:13 ). Most commonly, fire is associated with the judgment of hell ( Matt 3:12 ; 5:22 ; 18:8-9 ; Mark 9:43 Mark 9:48 ; Luke 3:17 ; 16:24 ; James 3:6 ; Jude 7 ; Rev 20:14-15 ), or with the destruction of the old heavens and earth in preparation for the new ( 2 Peter 3:10 2 Peter 3:12 ).

Eugene H. Merrill

See also Hell; Judgment; Judgment, Day of; Lake of Fire; Theophany

Bibliography. E. M. Good, IDB, 2:268-69; J. Patrick, Dictionary of the Bible, 2:9-10; J. C. Slayton, 5:372-73; H. Van Broekhoven, Jr., ISBE, 2:305-6.

Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology. Edited by Walter A. Elwell
Copyright © 1996 by Walter A. Elwell. Published by Baker Books, a division of
Baker Book House Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan USA.
All rights reserved. Used by permission.
For usage information, please read the Baker Book House Copyright Statement.

[N] indicates this entry was also found in Nave's Topical Bible
[T] indicates this entry was also found in Torrey's Topical Textbook
[E] indicates this entry was also found in Easton's Bible Dictionary
[J] indicates this entry was also found in Jack Van Impe's Prophecy Dictionary
[S] indicates this entry was also found in Smith's Bible Dictionary
Bibliography Information
Elwell, Walter A. "Entry for 'Fire'". "Evangelical Dictionary of Theology". . 1997.

Dictionaries - Easton's Bible Dictionary - Fire
Fire [N] [T] [B] [S]
For sacred purposes. The sacrifices were consumed by fire ( Genesis 8:20 ). The ever-burning fire on the altar was first kindled from heaven ( Leviticus 6:9 Leviticus 6:13 ; 9:24 ), and afterwards rekindled at the dedication of Solomon's temple ( 2 Chronicles 7:1 2 Chronicles 7:3 ). The expressions "fire from heaven" and "fire of the Lord" generally denote lightning, but sometimes also the fire of the altar was so called ( Exodus 29:18 ; Leviticus 1:9 ; 2:3 ; Leviticus 3:5 Leviticus 3:9 ).
Fire for a sacred purpose obtained otherwise than from the altar was called "strange fire" ( Leviticus 10:1 Leviticus 10:2 ; Numbers 3:4 ).

The victims slain for sin offerings were afterwards consumed by fire outside the camp ( Leviticus 4:12 Leviticus 4:21 ; 6:30 ; 16:27 ; Hebrews 13:11 ).

For domestic purposes, such as baking, cooking, warmth, etc. ( Jeremiah 36:22 ; Mark 14:54 ; John 18:18 ). But on Sabbath no fire for any domestic purpose was to be kindled ( Exodus 35:3 ; Numbers 15:32-36 ).
Punishment of death by fire was inflicted on such as were guilty of certain forms of unchastity and incest ( Leviticus 20:14 ; 21:9 ). The burning of captives in war was not unknown among the Jews ( 2 Samuel 12:31 ; Jeremiah 29:22 ). The bodies of infamous persons who were executed were also sometimes burned ( Joshua 7:25 ; 2 Kings 23:16 ).
In war, fire was used in the destruction of cities, as Jericho ( Joshua 6:24 ), Ai ( 8:19 ), Hazor ( 11:11 ), Laish (Judg. 18:27 ), etc. The war-chariots of the Canaanites were burnt ( Joshua 11:6 Joshua 11:9 Joshua 11:13 ). The Israelites burned the images ( 2 Kings 10:26 ; RSV, "pillars") of the house of Baal. These objects of worship seem to have been of the nature of obelisks, and were sometimes evidently made of wood.
Torches were sometimes carried by the soldiers in battle ( Judges 7:16 ).

Figuratively, fire is a symbol of Jehovah's presence and the instrument of his power ( Exodus 14:19 ; Numbers 11:1 Numbers 11:3 ; Judg. 13:20 ; 1 Kings 18:38 ; 2 Kings 1 Kings 1:10 1 Kings 1:12 ; 2:11 ; Isaiah 6:4 ; Ezek. 1:4 ; Revelation 1:14 , etc.).
God's word is also likened unto fire ( Jeremiah 23:29 ). It is referred to as an emblem of severe trials or misfortunes ( Zechariah 12:6 ; Luke 12:49 ; 1 Corinthians 3:13 1 Corinthians 3:15 ; 1 Peter 1:7 ), and of eternal punishment ( Matthew 5:22 ; Mark 9:44 ; Revelation 14:10 ; 21:8 ).

The influence of the Holy Ghost is likened unto fire ( Matthew 3:11 ). His descent was denoted by the appearance of tongues as of fire ( Acts 2:3 ).

These dictionary topics are from
M.G. Easton M.A., D.D., Illustrated Bible Dictionary, Third Edition,
published by Thomas Nelson, 1897. Public Domain, copy freely.



I wish to suggest a conclusion  not quite reached by the writer above: that the Spirit WAS the fire which consumed offerings and enemies alike, that manifestations of fire from God were the Holy Spirit acting in ways we see as destructive some times but which advanced God's will.  It is a bit of a jump, but not all that far and I fully understand writers not willing to make it since the Bible does not specifically designate the Spirit in action as those fires.  I merely think it becomes obvious when we add the revelation of the New Testament.  It is not then a "symbol" of his power, but the manifestation of Himself in acting for His People.

The Spirit then becomes more obviously there, making the Trinity, the complete person of God there together, here functioning, meaning Jesus was not the only person of God sent to Earth, here acting throughout history, in contact with humanity, hovering, impacting directly.

We've pretty much known this, sensed it by the Spirit in us, but now we see it laid out, That even as we studied Jesus walking with Adam and Eve  in the Garden, the Spirit was there, too.  It just didn't manifest.  I what Jesus says later to the Apostles is true and it must be because he said it, then perhaps there is so me point we need to see:

John 16:6 But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart.
 7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
 8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: {reprove: or, convince}
 (KJV)

We touched on this in our study of John, but it remains one mystery not completely revealed to us: it seems that, when Jesus is there, the Spirit resides in Him alone.  Or in his body.

Matt Henry:

16:7-15 Christ's departure was necessary to the Comforter's coming. Sending the Spirit was to be the fruit of Christ's death, which was his going away. His bodily presence could be only in one place at one time, but his Spirit is every where, in all places, at all times, wherever two or three are gathered together in his name. 

See here the office of the Spirit, first to reprove, or to convince. Convincing work is the Spirit's work; he can do it effectually, and none but he. It is the method the Holy Spirit takes, first to convince, and then to comfort. The Spirit shall convince the world, of sin; not merely tell them of it. The Spirit convinces of the fact of sin; of the fault of sin; of the folly of sin; of the filth of sin, that by it we are become hateful to God; of the fountain of sin, the corrupt nature; and lastly, of the fruit of sin, that the end thereof is death. 
The Holy Spirit proves that all the world is guilty before God. 

He convinces the world of righteousness; that Jesus of Nazareth was Christ the righteous. Also, of Christ's righteousness, imparted to us for justification and salvation. He will show them where it is to be had, and how they may be accepted as righteous in God's sight. Christ's ascension proves the ransom was accepted, and the righteousness finished, through which believers were to be justified.

Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged. All will be well, when his power is broken, who made all the mischief. As Satan is subdued by Christ, this gives us confidence, for no other power can stand before him. And of the day of judgment. The coming of the Spirit would be of unspeakable advantage to the disciples. 

The Holy Spirit is our Guide, not only to show us the way, but to go with us by continued aids and influences. To be led into a truth is more than barely to know it; it is not only to have the notion of it in our heads, but the relish, and savor, and power of it in our hearts. He shall teach all truth, and keep back nothing profitable, for he will show things to come. All the gifts and graces of the Spirit, all the preaching, and all the writing of the apostles, under the influence of the Spirit, all the tongues, and miracles, were to glorify Christ. 

It behoves every one to ask, whether the Holy Spirit has begun a good work in his heart? Without clear discovery of our guilt and danger, we never shall understand the value of Christ's salvation; but when brought to know ourselves aright, we begin to see the value of the Redeemer. We should have fuller views of the Redeemer, and more lively affections to him, if we more prayed for, and depended on the Holy Spirit.

But the Second Adam thing stirs us.  Along with the Last Adam.

If we have Adam's genetics flowing through us, then we have Jesus' genetics through us also.  We are all linked in that way as we suggested last time, then there is something inherent we need to further understand.

The Holy Spirit was comfortable inhabiting that body.  It knows every genetic structure to it,  We have the Earth form which becomes our future flesh.  The Spirit sees the pieces of Jesus split up in the pieces of us and it tried to draw them all back together. It longs for the union that is the complete body of Christ.

Recall Paul's lecture on the body:

1 Corinthians  12:12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.
 13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. {Gentiles: Gr. Greeks}
 14  For the body is not one member, but many.
 15 If the foot shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?
 16 And if the ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of the body; is it therefore not of the body?
 17 If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?
 18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him.
 19 And if they were all one member, where were the body?
 20 But now are they many members, yet but one body.
 21 And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you.
 22 Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, are necessary:
 23 And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more abundant comeliness. {bestow: or, put on}
 24 For our comely parts have no need: but God hath tempered the body together, having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked:
 25 That there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. {schism: or, division}
 26 And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it.
 27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.


I believe Paul was prompted by the Spirit to make that allusion.  We are of the body now not just in the flesh but in the Spirit once we accept Christ.  We are being renewed, but the Spirit draws us together for greater strength for the mission.

In The Pain Chronicles, Melanie Thernstrom reports that results of studies show: "people who attend religious services live longer and are generally healthier, less depressed and  less likely to be disabled...Christians who attended church one a week lived an average of six years longer than non-attendees-while those who attended more than once a week lived an average of seven years longer."  There seems to be no relevant explanation for it other than "positive thinking" from her sectarian point of view.  But it seems that, through whatever means, the Spirit wants humanity together and offers positive benefits from that togetherness.

When we see political choices dividing us, we see something other than the Spirit working.  When one party or the other begins to dominate a church, it drives others off others who believe in the other party and we have the same divisions Paul spoke again in that same letter to the Corinthians.


1Co 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? {divisions: or, factions} {as men: Gr. according to man?}
 4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?
 5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?
 6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.
 7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.
 8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.
 9 For we are labourers together with God: ye are God's husbandry, ye are God's building. {husbandry: or, tillage}
 10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.

 (KJV)

When we allow divisions we see we are carnal, not following the Spirit.  His whole first letter to Corinth was a cry against the things that divide since the Spirit wants the body healthy,  It is good for the body of Christ and for the fleshly bodies he now inhabits.

Jesus was the Last Adam because he ended the law of the Flesh, the rules and regulations carved in stone for those who choose to follow Him and did something different:


Jer 31:32 Not like the agreement which I made with their fathers, on the day when I took them by the hand to be their guide out of the land of Egypt; which agreement was broken by them, and I gave them up, says the Lord.
 33 But this is the agreement which I will make with the people of Israel after those days, says the Lord; I will put my law in their inner parts, writing it in their hearts; and I will be their God, and they will be my people.
 34 And no longer will they be teaching every man his neighbour and every man his brother, saying, Get knowledge of the Lord: for they will all have knowledge of me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the Lord: for they will have my forgiveness for their evil-doing, and their sin will go from my memory for ever.
 (BBE)

And repeated in the NT:

Hebrews 8:8 For, protesting against them, he says, See, the days are coming when I will make a new agreement with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah;
 9 Not like the agreement which I made with their fathers when I took them by the hand, to be their guide out of the land of Egypt; for they did not keep the agreement with me, and I gave them up, says the Lord.
 10 For this is the agreement which I will make with the people of Israel after those days: I will put my laws into their minds, writing them in their hearts: and I will be their God, and they will be my people:
 11 And there will be no need for every man to be teaching his brother, or his neighbour, saying, This is the knowledge of the Lord: for they will all have knowledge of me, great and small.
 (BBE)

Heb 10:14 Because by one offering he has made complete for ever those who are made holy.
 15 And the Holy Spirit is a witness for us: for after he had said,
 16 This is the agreement which I will make with them after those days, says the Lord; I will put my laws in their hearts, writing them in their minds; he said,
 17 And I will keep no more memory of their sins and of their evil-doings.
 18 Now where there is forgiveness of these, there is no more offering for sin.
 19 So then, my brothers, being able to go into the holy place without fear, because of the blood of Jesus,
 (BBE)


And our shared genetics with Christ makes it easy to write the word on our hearts and in our minds.  Recall that research that we all have a "God gene" that we are genetically programmed to need God.  Now we can suggest it may be because we share genes WITH the Son of God.  Our very fabric cries out for Him, the flesh longing after him as the soul does. And the Spirit there with the answer.

Before Christ, our bodies were like Valjean, in the prison of the Law, found guilty by even the slightest sin.  Then, in salvation, we are given the treasures we need to flourish, to grow in the Spirit and renew the aching body for a brief time, to face the power of sin over humanity, the power of death.  Now we can sing a song to the freedom we've found.

But the power that Satan gained in sin still pursues us because Christ didn't want that freedom just for his direct line, but for all the human line with Adan and Jesus genes.  So we run in a war we can't comprehend.

But the Holy Spirit wages that war.  Wages it against the sin of the flesh, for the ultimate destiny of the flesh.  And,  next post, we'll discuss this guy even more and the way he arms us for the true battle we face
















Friday, March 24, 2017

                                                              The Other Guy

So we move from the Master to the disaster.   From the guy who came to rescue us to the thing who got us to jump overboard in the beginning.  As we go on, the reasons for this little side journey will become clear.

We have a record of his MO.  We've posted them and discussed them a bit but let's get a little bit more discussion as we proceed.   

This is how he got us the first time:

Ge 3:1 Now the serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said to the woman, Is it so that God has said, You shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
 2 And the woman said to the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden.
 3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the middle of the garden, God has said, You shall not eat of it, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.
 4 And the serpent said to the woman, You shall not surely die,
 5 for God knows that in the day you eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
 6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food. and that it was pleasing to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make wise, she took of its fruit, and ate. She also gave to her husband with her, and he ate.
 7 And the eyes of both of them were opened. And they knew that they were naked. And they sewed fig leaves together and made girdles for themselves.
 (MKJV)


A commentary not mentioned when we earlier touched on this passage, Patrick-Lowth-Whitby-Lowman:

Genesis 3:1 Ge 3:1



Eusebius observes (lib. 7 Praepar. Evang. cap. 9, 10), that Moses, having settled the great doctrines of the  creation of the world, and the dignity of man, made in the image of God’ proceeds very wisely to instruct the Israelites, that there are none so happy, but, without due care and watchfulness, may become most miserable: there being (as his words are) a wicked demon at every man’s elbo, “envois, a hater of those that are good, and from the beginning a wily underminer of men’s salvation.”
Now this following immediately after the relation of the formation of Eve, hath made some fancy, that our very first parents fell the very same day they were made. And thus much, I think, must be supposed—that they did not continue very long in their happy state: for if they had persisted steadfastly in their duty for a considerable time, they would have acquired such a habit of well-doing, as would not have been so easily lost. But that they continued longer than a day, there are many circumstances to induce us to believe. For it required some time for Adam to be acquainted with all other creatures, and to impose names upon them: and there being none of them a meet help for him, he slept some time, till Eve had taken her beginning out of him. Whom, when he saw, he received, and owned her for his wife; and no doubt made more reflections upon God’s wisdom, power, and goodness, than are set down in this sacred story. They both also received a command from God, not to eat of one tree in the garden: into which, when they were brought, we cannot but think they walked about, and took such a view of it, as to be convinced, by the bountiful provision God had made - for them, they had no reason to complain of the small restraint he had laid upon them. All which could not be performed so speedily as some have imagined: for though God can do what he pleases in an instant, yet man cannot; and God himself did not in one day create the world. And, besides that, some time was necessary for transacting all these things; it is not likely the devil would immediately set upon Eve, as soon as the command was laid upon them; but rather let it be a little forgotten. And if the time be observed when he assaulted her, it will much confirm this opinion, which was in the absence of her husband; for that we cannot easily believe to have been upon the same day they were created. The extraordinary kindness they had one for the other, will scarce allow us to think it possible, they should be so soon separated. It is plain also, God “sanctified the seventh day” before their fall; which it is highly probable they spent in admiring and praising the almighty goodness.

[The serpent] Or, that serpent (as some think it should be translated) which the tempter made use of, as his instrument to deceive.

[Was more subtle] The whole species of serpents is noted by Aristotle (lib. 1. Histor. Animal, cap. 1) to be “extremely insidious; but this was extraordinarily wily. What sort it was is not here expressed: but all agree there is now none like it; the curse of God having degraded it. St. Basil in his Book of Paradise (p. 627) saith, it was not a frightful creature, as it is now, but mild and gentle: not crawling and winding about, in a terrible manner, upon the ground, “but lofty, and going upright upon its feet.” Several of the Jews have been of this opinion; and our famous Mr. Mede inclines to it. (Discourse 38 p. 291, &c.) But I take the conjecture of another very learned person, now a bishop of our church, to be far more probable: which I shall endeavor to strengthen. There were (and still are in the eastern and southern parts of the world) serpents having wings, and shining very brightly, like to fire. So we read Isa 14:29 of “a flying fiery serpent.” Which fiery serpents are called seraphims, in Nu 21:6,8, and termed fiery, not merely with respect to their venom, which made sore inflammations on the bodies of those who were bitten by them, but because they appeared shining like fire when they flew in the air,

Whence seraphim is the name also of the highest sort of angels (called the “angels of the presence,” Isa 6:2,6), who appeared, I suppose, in some such form with flaming wings. (For otherwise, I cannot think serpents would have been honored as sacred things in so many countries, as we find they anciently were, unless they had been the symbols of angels.
The devil, therefore, I conceive, made use of some serpent (but of a more surpassing brightness than any now extant), that he might resemble one of the most illustrious angels, who appeared sometimes in the like shape. Which moved Eve the more readily to hearken unto the voice of the serpent; taking it to be one of the heavenly seraphims, which she had seen sometime, in such a splendid form, attend upon the Divine glory, or majesty: for the angels always made a part of the Shechinah. 

And thus, one would think, Tertullian understood this matter, when he said (in his book De Praescript. Haeret. Cap. 47), Istum fuisse serpentem, cui Eva, ut filio Dei, crediderat; “this was the serpent to whom Eve gave credit as to the Son of God.” Which, ‘if any one take to be the words of the heretics he is there speaking of; yet those are not which we find in his book against the Valentinians (cap. 2), where he saith the serpent was a primordio Divinae imaginis praedio, “an usurper of the Divine image from the beginning.” (See Dr. Tenison of Idolatry, p. 356.) ‘To which that passage in Epiphanius may be added, who mentions some heretics (who might have some truth among them) that said, the woman listened to the serpent, and “believed him,” or was persuaded by him, “as the Son of God.”(Haeres. 37. n. 25.) And, one would think. Rabbi Bechai had this notion in his mind, when he said (upon the 14th verse of this chapter), “This is the secret (or mystery, of the holy language), that a serpent is called Saraph, as an angel is called Saraph.” For which he quotes the forenamed place Nu 21:6, and then adds, The Scripture calls serpents seraphim, because they were toledoth hanacash hakadmoni, the offspring of this old serpent: understand this (so he concludes, as our Saviour speaks in another case, “Whoso readeth, let him understand”), as a matter of great concernment. Which can have no other meaning, I think, but this; that the devil, (whom St. John also calls the old serpent,” Re 12:9), in this serpent here spoken of, counterfeited a glorious seraphim, and thereby seduced Eve to give credit to him.

(I, meantime, am moved to point out that the serpent form may have been appropriate for Satan to abscond because it fit his own angelic form.)

However this be, it is most reasonable to suppose, it was some beautiful creature; by whom Eve thought an angel, who wished them well, discoursed with her: for she was not so simple as to think that beasts could speak; much less that they knew more of God’s mind than herself, Nor doth it seem at all credible to me, that she could have been otherways deceived, but by some creature which appeared so gloriously, that she took it for a heavenly minister; who, she thought, came to explain to them the meaning of the Divine command.

Yea, hath God said, This doth not look like the beginning of a discourse, but the conclusion: as the Jews themselves have observed. And it is not improbable, that the tempter, before he spake these words, represented himself as one of the heavenly court; who came, or was sent to congratulate the happiness that God bath bestowed upon them in paradise: which was so great, that he could not easily believe he had denied them any of the fruit of the garden. 

He desired therefore to be satisfied from her own mouth, of the truth of what he pretended to have heard; or to know how they understood the command of God: for so these words may be translated, “Is it true indeed, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree. &c. Which is a very ancient interpretation, and more probable than theirs, who would have the Hebrew particles, aph ki, signify as much as ut ut: “Although God hath said, Ye shall not eat, notwithstanding, ye shall not die.” So they suppose he was going to add; but, before he had spoken the latter part of the sentence, Eve interrupted him, saying, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden.” This had been too gross, flatly to contradict what God had said; whereas, the beginning of the verse tells us, he went more subtly to work.


No. 1:  Did God really say that?  You need to understand that the battle for a literal six day creation story seems to be a battle against Satan for so many of my brothers and sisters.  They feel that doubting the literal word "day" and thinking it to mean a span of time like an era is falling for the Devil's ploy in Eden.  We see it again and again in Christian ranks, the sudden need to have this or that sentence be exact.  In some cases it is in fact very vital.  One group that calls itself Christian insists that Jesus has no deity, is an Angel and therefore translates the Book of John  to say that Jesus was with God  and was a god.



In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. The New World Translation
God was the word in GreekThis is one of the most common verses of contention between the Jehovah's Witnesses and Christians. Their false assumption is that Jesus is not God in flesh but Michael the archangel who became a man.  Therefore, since they deny that Jesus is divine, they have altered the Bible in John 1:1 so that Jesus is not divine in nature.  The New World Translation has added the word "a" to the verse so it says, " . . . and the Word was a god."  The correct translation of this verse is "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God."  This is how it is rendered in the NASB, NIV, KJV, NKJV, ASV, RSV, etc.

(A full discussion at: https://carm.org/john-1-1-word-was-god)

Or from another sect:

King James Version John 1:1 — In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:4 — In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
Joseph Smith TranslationJohn 1:1 — In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God.
John 1:4 — In him was the gospel, and the gospel was the life, and the life was the light of men.
An examination of the textual apparatus reveals the possibility of a slightly different punctuation for verses 3b and 4a (All things were made through him; and without him was not anything made. That which has been made was life in him, and the life was the light of men.). This, however, has no bearing whatsoever on the changes introduced in the JST. There is no indication that anything from the original manuscripts has been left out of our text at these points and the reading restored by Smith is wholly unwarranted.

It does, however, reflect Joseph Smith’s personal theology concerning Jesus and the gospel. It appears that to Smith, it was the gospel that had a preeminent position. He rallied people around himself with the claim to have restored the gospel in these last days; that all churches were wrong, their creeds an abomination to God and their professors corrupt.1 It was the gospel of Mormonism that would save people, for it alone had restored the necessary ordinances that all other sects were missing.

While it is true that Jesus is often mentioned in LDS circles, he is not the Jesus of the Bible. This also is reflected in the JST. Jesus was procreated, the son of Elohim and a goddess mother, his spirit brother was Lucifer. He became a god by obeying the LDS ordinances, just as we can become gods if we do the same.2 I believe this is another reason for the interpolation and emphasis on “the gospel” found in John chapter one, verses one and four.



In both cases, the text is subverted and altered to reflect doctrines and theologies of cults which do not accept Christ as part of a Trinity or Godhead.  In both cases the believer in these churches risks not actually knowing Jesus but knowing a diluted version.  Or as seeing him as unknowable.  Recall we said how important it was to know that Jesus was the Son of God, that his divinity was the only way He could have been an adequate sacrifice.  If he is seen as merely Fallen Flesh alone, even Adamic First Flesh, that is still not enough. And it should be noted that idea never crosses the theologies  of either of the cults mentioned so that our Savior would be mere mortal or worse angel who would have no idea what humanity was like after all.  

This is one very clear reason why we have the dry dusty librarian functions of hermeneutics and people spending their lives learning Latin and Greek and Jewish languages.  Learning to dissect verbs and adverbs, nouns and adjectives.  Parsing the verses so we may, at this juncture, have so much real research at hand as to have full weaponry to present Satan with the answer. "Yes, God DID say that."
I can't imagine their studiousness nor the reward the Lord holds for them for their efforts to defend the faith at its very root.  I sometimes kid about their efforts but compared to this small blog, they stand easily as titans 

It was also why Wycliffe and hundreds of others with language skills came forward centuries ago to translate the Word into languages all could read, so that any doctrine could be questioned and analyzed by people everywhere and so that those with the gifting of knowledge from God could bring the truth to light, ministers and teachers, prophets and elders.   Why Martin Luther pounded nails into his objections to doctrine, his 95 Theses, which he left on the Wittenberg Church door.  Tyndale executed for his Bible translation into English. John Huss the Czech Priest whose objections to Catholic doctrines got him burned at the stake.  All standing for the exactness of doctrine on the exact Word of God.  

Notice that Satan also plays the trick of misquoting just to get the conversation started.  He has to have a reply from humanity for it to begin.  He has to begin a relationship in  some way.  He has that now with sin in our lives but he didn't have it then in Eden.  Being in the form of the serpent, Eve could have told him to go away then.  But she did reply.  He had an open door to humanity since then.
  
Then, in verse 3, Eve becomes the Pharisee and adds to God's word.  Compare:

Ge 2:17 but you shall not eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. For in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.

 (MKJV)

3b:  God has said, You shall not eat of it, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.

Either Adam added to it when telling her the warning or she did so herself.  Either way, that little tidbit reminds us how we get about God's warnings.  He tells us to not work on the Sabbath and we set out a ton of rules defining work.  He tells us Gentiles may become saved and then the council of the Church added a dietary rule about strangled food.  He tells us to avoid pornography and churches ban the internet or set up filters that won't let any biological information through.

We love our rules and His rules more than we love Him.  Most of the time. And that,  not the laws themselves, gets us into trouble most of the time.  Our hearts get off the Person who loves us and on the way  He tells jus will show Him love.   It's easy to follow a rule.  It's harder to love.  Even in Eden.  It was harder to love.


4 And the serpent said to the woman, You shall not surely die,

Patrick, et al  again:

Genesis 3:4 Ge 3:4

 Ye shall not surely die: You are under a mistake: death will not be the certain consequence of your eating this fruit: for God is too good to inflict 

such a heavy punishment for so small a fault.


Then we have the lie.  The "father of lies"  as Jesus called him.  This is the most important lesson to learn about Satan:  If a lie is involved, somewhere along the way, he's involved.  It can be a public lie like "this person wiretapped my home" or a private lie, like "I want to murder that guy and then things will get better" but this and all lies and liars  come from their father.  All cause harm and are always used by us or by Satan to advance an agenda usually against God's wishes, always one to somehow advance ourselves which is the format for next lie.

But for the lies to work, Satan takes an element of truth.  They didn't die immediately.  Physically.  They died immediately spiritually.  Physical death came later.  That fact let's us lie to ourselves every day that we are not going to die.  That somehow there will always be an Earthly tomorrow.  That let's us lie and cheat and steal, to become billionaires and take other people's promised government programs and benefits they have paid for over years away from them for our own worldly enhancement and say that we are doing God's work because we aren't facing Him tomorrow or the next instant.  

Of course there's another element once discussed:  Satan can't create anything.  He couldn't create a world to live in once God tossed him out so he stole Earth.  He couldn't create any idea of a government so he stole God's levels of administration and we have "powers and principalities".  He couldn't even make up lies from whole clothe.   


But  those kind thoughts from Patrick really don't follow in the context of what comes next from Satan:

5 for God knows that in the day you eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.


It seems vastly more likely that Satan's comment on not dying was made to set up his idea that God was withholding a great truth.  "He lied about you not dying to keep you from a greater truth that I have right here..."  Every spiritual charlatan starts there.

To be more accurate, I think it possible Satan actually believes part of this: that he can be like God by seducing followers.  He has deceived himself into believing he can be God so he sells the lie to others.  Worse, he sees his way to being God by sabotaging any plan God has, even if he can't understand it or see where it goes or even comprehend the mission of it.  Some suggest he knows he's going to fail and end on the lake of fire and wants to take everyone he can with him,  It may be that simple, but it also may be that he engages in magical thinking and follows the notion that he is in some sort of race and can seduce enough people away from God to change the plan or that God needs worship so if he takes enough worship away he will take God's power away. I have seen this lie in comic books and in New Age writing.   He has never understood that God's power comes from who He is.  That people truly worship God because of his love, not his power.  In fact, it is when we become enamored of God's power that it becomes our god instead of Him.  (More on that later when we discuss his attempted seduction of Jesus.)

But the line of seduction becomes clear;  God's Word isn't true because God is hiding the secret that you will become like him if you get this secret knowledge that only comes by disobeying his rule.  Remember

But now I wonder if that may touch on the message God has had for us all along.  That only by Him living in us, inhabiting us by the Holy Spirit may we fulfill our destiny. Even with just one rule, even with everything set up perfectly around us, even with one clear job to do and all the rewards in the world for doing it, we failed.  Eve did not have the Holy Spirit inside even though she walked with God every evening, even though she had all He gave here, making her not unlike the angels Satan seduced.  Meaning all of god's creation is vulnerable because he loves us enough to let us be vulnerable instead of impregnable robots and only the Holy Spirit can keep us on track.

Even in Eden, we still thought we could do something else which we could choose and that would be as good as what God offered.  We still are seduced by it if we don't have the Holy Spirit and if we refuse to follow Him.  The Mormons, mentioned above, have all manner of good living ideas from a proper diet to clean living and still they think they will be like God AFTER death.  They have a new law, a greater revelation and following God's law and theirs becomes the new god.  This is not to say we don't all do this in some way when we aren't listening to the Spirit; we do.  This is merely a blatant example of it.

We can also choose to follow our own longings and call them God's.  We often want to impose his rules on others, those who are unsaved or lost or have chosen another god. When these serve social needs like a penalty for killing, we sympathize and join in.  When they serve a social need to impose a 1950's ideal of living such as  the mom at home fetching dad's hat as he goes off to work while we have allowed the economy to gut that idea, then no one should sympathize.  Nostalgia  for a "better time" can often interfere unless we realize that was a "better time" only for some and Christians should only wish to live in God's "time."  Satan will always deceive as "the father of lies" and that deception will many times be subtle and misleading instead of a call for direct rebellion, though direct rebellion will usually result.

But he can refine his deception for even the saved.  Even for the Savior.


Luke 4:1 And Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness
 2 forty days, being tempted by the Devil. And in those days He ate nothing. And they being ended, He afterward was hungry.
 3 And the Devil said to Him, If you are the Son of God, speak to this stone that it might become bread.
 4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written that "man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."
 5 And the Devil, leading Him up into a high mountain, showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
 6 And the Devil said to Him, All this power I will give you, and the glory of them; for it has been delivered to me. And I give it to whomever I will.
 7 Therefore if you will worship me, all shall be yours.
 8 And Jesus answered and said to him, Get behind me, Satan! For it is written, "You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve."
 9 And he brought Him to Jerusalem and sat Him on a pinnacle of the temple and said to Him, If you are the Son of God, cast yourself down from here.
 10 For it is written, "He shall give His angels charge over You, to keep You;
 11 and in their hands they shall bear You up, lest at any time You dash Your foot against a stone."
 12 And Jesus answering said to him, It has been said, "You shall not tempt the Lord your God."
 13 And when the Devil had ended every temptation, he departed from Him for a time.

 (MKJV)


Here we have the story of similar temptations but with striking differences.

1) Jesus is full of the Spirit.  If you or I were heading into the wilderness, we might first have a hearty breakfast to be full of food.  Then we would outfit, first with the best knife possible then with a gun, then with food and supplies.  (With the knife you can always make some shelter and get some food with the gun you can also accomplish food with large prey but you run out of ammo eventually.)  Jesus takes nothing but the clothes on his back.

2) It is the Spirit which leads him.  Eve was attacked by the serpent when she wasn't walking with God.  The Spirit is now in Jesus and leading him into trial.  Jesus is not unsuspecting.  He is following.  He is actually trusting God.

This reinforces the idea that the Spirit was always the important part.

3) Jesus goes to weakness.  I trust the Spirit to lead me to the refrigerator and the right stuff for a sandwich.  Jesus trusts Him to lead Him to fast for days.  And the Devil comes AFTER the fasting, when Jesus is physically weak, without any of the things God gave even for necessity let alone comfort, not about the apparent work of God, realizing that the work of God is yielding to God.

How often do I forget that?  How often do you?  Those "things of the world" come rolling in (right now I also have to get my tax forms done).  How often do our desires distract us?  Idols loom.   Jesus had none of that.

Satan attacks physical weakness first.


 3 And the Devil said to Him, If you are the Son of God, speak to this stone that it might become bread.

Two things:

First, "IF" you are the Son of God.  I suspect there is a lot going on in that part of the sentence.  Satan may not be sure.  Jesus has the Holy Spirit and God has sent the Spirit to indwell Him, but Satan doesn't believe God.  REMEMBER that.  He lies himself so he can't believe anyone else, even God.  A being who tells lies while intent on getting his ways (Mr, President) cannot believe others tell the truth,  His lie is his reality.  He has drawn others into his reality so it must be the REAL thing though he himself has built it on lies,  He isn't sure this is Christ.  Second, he faces a weakened Jesus and hopes to undermine His confidence in his identity even as he did with Eve.  "Are you God?  You are starving, you know.  God's Son starving in  the desert.  That's as preposterous as him being born in a manger or making a living as a carpenter.  All that sweating and those callouses.  What a joke!"

then the follow up:  "Prove it to me."

Prove it to me to take care of your own weakness as well.   Ego,  i doubt you are God's son,  Prove it to me.  

You can turn the stones into something to feed your body.  And feed your ego,  

His first thing: "Did God say...?"  Becomes Jesus best defense,  Complete defense.  

4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written that "man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God."

He knows who He is.  He will declare it artfully and directly throughout His ministry.  He is firmly locked into his identity as the Son of God, God himself in the flesh but subservient to God the Father. 

John 5:16 And for this reason the Jews were turned against Jesus, because he was doing these things on the Sabbath.
 17 But his answer was: My Father is still working even now, and so I am working.
 18 For this cause the Jews had an even greater desire to put Jesus to death, because not only did he not keep the Sabbath but he said God was his Father, so making himself equal with God.
 19 So Jesus made answer and said, Truly I say to you, The Son is not able to do anything himself; he is able to do only what he sees the Father doing; whatever the Father does the Son does it in the same way.
 20 For the Father has love for the Son and lets him see everything which he does: and he will let him see greater works than these so that you may be full of wonder.

 (BBE)

He talks it and lives it, talked it AFTER He lived it in the wilderness, starving, facing the toughest foe the other side had to offer,

The Devil takes the tempting to the next level then.  "Here's everything in the world,  i won it in a card game in Vegas.  You can have it all.  Just worship me."

(I saw one health and wealth preacher say "He was going to get it anyway."  As the reason Jesus resisted.  So I guess we should pursue wealth offered by Satan because we won't get it all.  Now that is a real faith ministry.  For the sake of translation, that is sarcasm.)



One thing to emphasize:  And I give it to whomever I will.

Please consider this when you see rich people.  Please realize wealth is not always a gift of God.  The pharisees lived by that myth and the money became their life.  And the disciples believed it and were stunned by the way Christ ignored the person's outward appearance.  For some it may well keep them from accepting Christ.  Money is the root of much evil.  And that will never stop a starving man from jumping at a sandwich offer.  Only walking in the Spirit can keep a man from turning down the world.

 "Get behind me, Satan! For it is written, "You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve."

Now  HE can order Satan around because He's Christ.   Pay attention.  We can back him down only when we are walking with Christ.  It's that thing where you're with your older brother and he kicks the bully away from you.  Please remember: YOU ARE NOT THE OLDER BROTHER.  

Jas 4:7 For this cause be ruled by God; but make war on the Evil One and he will be put to flight before you.
 8 Come near to God and he will come near to you. Make your hands clean, you evil-doers; put away deceit from your hearts, you false in mind.

 (BBE)

As for him tempting you:

2Ti 2:22 Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.
 (KJV)

Jesus didn't exactly flee, but then He wasn't at full strength what with starving and all.   And it was also God's will for Him to prove one more point.

 9 And he brought Him to Jerusalem and sat Him on a pinnacle of the temple and said to Him, If you are the Son of God, cast yourself down from here.
 10 For it is written, "He shall give His angels charge over You, to keep You;
 11 and in their hands they shall bear You up, lest at any time You dash Your foot against a stone."

Jerusalem.  He loves the city; God founded the city:

Mt 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, that killeth the prophets, and stoneth them that are sent unto her! how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
 38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
 39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
 (ASV)

The Temple.  He loves God's house:

Mt 21:12 And Jesus entered into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of he money-changers, and the seats of them that sold the doves;
 13 and he saith unto them, It is written, My house shall be called a house of prayer: but ye make it a den of robbers.
 (ASV)

"Don't just prove it to me, prove it to everyone.  Take the glory you were meant to take right now!"

And that kind of sums it all up; "Take it now."  It's kind of like a bad money ad:  "You have  kingdom coming but you need cash NOW!"  Never mentions you don't get all the cash you REALLY deserve because of the interest charged on the buy out.  The Lake of Fire sounds like really steep eternal interest.

But Jesus knows who He is.  He doesn't need to claim it before others.  He never came for a moment's glory but to glory God.  He knows his enemy as well.  he saw him tossed out of heaven and soon he'll have the privilege of being the bouncer himself or perhaps again,  Doesn't really say of He did it the first time.

Keep in mind:  God led his own Son into heavy temptation to prepare Him and as an example to us.  I saw this happen in the life of a new Christian and I feel I failed him by not being there enough when he saw his life falling backward.  If you face temptation. recall Satan seems to need to ask permission as implied in Job.  Recall, too:

1Co 10:12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
 13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as man can bear: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation make also the way of escape, that ye may be able to endure it.
 14 Wherefore, my beloved, flee from idolatry.
 (ASV)

It is just readily apparent our Big Brother can take way more temptation than the rest of us.  Recall, too:

Matt 4:11 Then the devil leaveth him; and behold, angels came and ministered unto him.

He does leave.  He even left Job alone.  But the two followups are important.

Angels came and ministered.  God sends comfort.  He has THE Comforter living in us. He has prepped us.  There are also still angels out there working for Him.  There will be an end here or in Heaven and Heaven  seems a place of even deeper comfort.

But while on Earth we remember this, too:

13 And when the Devil had ended every temptation, he departed from Him for a time.

The Devil leaves but only "for a time."  He popped up during the ministry, too. 

 Mt 16:22 And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall never be unto thee.
 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art a stumbling-block unto me: for thou mindest not the things of God, but the things of men.
 (ASV)

Clearly this was one of the most evil suggestions ever offered to Jesus by any man, thus it was from the Devil. Peter was opposing the very purpose for which Jesus came into the world with reasons that would be appealing to Jesus as a temptation. This was the Devil putting forward this idea so why not look past Peter and label it for what it was.

Joh 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word.
 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father it is your will to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and standeth not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.

 (ASV)

The Pharisees this time.  

Lu 22:2 And the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might put him to death; for they feared the people.
 3 And Satan entered into Judas who was called Iscariot, being of the number of the twelve.
 4 And he went away, and communed with the chief priests and captains, how he might deliver him unto them.
 5 And they were glad, and covenanted to give him money.
 6 And he consented, and sought opportunity to deliver him unto them in the absence of the multitude.
  
And then directly into the traitor.

He was there.  He's still there deceiving the Fallen Flesh.  Until the end. And, in the end, we'll get back to him.