Showing posts with label Sin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sin. Show all posts

Friday, February 10, 2017

                                         THE POGOSTICK FOR THE  JUMP

                                                                      Summation

One message comes through from all the early Bible reading:  People die.  Sin is forever, but people die.

You may say: "Wait.  My sin is washed away."

How about Satan's sin?  You know, eternity in the lake of fire. The same for the False Prophet and the Antichrist.  The same for those who refuse to accept Christ as savior.  More on this when we discuss the Final Flesh, but you get the idea.

Sin is not a momentary thing.  Adam and Eve didn't just bite the fruit and then God said, "All's forgiven."  We don't insult someone or take their land or betray their trust and have it not reverberate behind that.  We may be forgiven, but the hurt we engender lives on. Why do you think we have to forgive those who sin against us?  Why do we have to let go of our anger at Hilary and at Donald? At Osama Bin Laden and at Putin?  At Mom or Dad? We may not think they were the best choice for the parent or the job, but we are not to hate them despite failures and character flaws.  I expect forgiveness and must let it flow from me as well.  We can see their errors, point them out and pray for a change of heart in ourselves and them, but we must forgive.

YOUR sin and MY  sin get washed away.  "I'm freeeeeee!!"

Recall when we had that perfect first flesh?  We had only one rule:  Don't eat that fruit.  So we ate it. But the bite goes on,    We fell.  We actually fell the first moment we listened to temptation but the actuality became OUR flesh and dwelt among us in our genes.  Our Fallen Flesh began to decay.  We start to die the moment we are born.  The wrong conditions and we do die early.  We opened the door to Death by sin and Death came rumbling in. Quiet, deadly.  And we rush to his arms with our excesses.  Disease, germs that wither the Fallen Flesh.  Measles, mumps, the common cold.  Flu which once threatened to kill everyone.  Cancer, Heart disease.    Then as now.

The first world of people got wiped out for their excesses.  Sin cried for power and lust and sang the operatic "Me, me, me, me!"  God giving them Enoch and then one last chance with Noah then sweeping them away because they would never accept Him.  They accepted only the flesh and the perceived  joys of sin. God preserving the line of Christ alone.  Noah and his family became the basis of all our genomes.  Did you see that?  The line of Christ also produced our line.

Say again: "The line of Christ also produced our line."

 Noah was a great man of God yet had his bad moment late in life with wine.  Sin goes on in the genes.

They were to populate the Earth.  They didn't spread out at first.  God had to move them with natural disasters and the desert around expanding and then Babel.  Nimrod united the Middle East and drove off the giants only to declare himself God.  Getting wrapped up in our own power. the way we all tend to see our successes as ours alone.  Sin took a mission that suited God and corrupted it.  As it had corrupted the flesh.

One man got the call.  Abraham.  THE call to be the beginning of the line. the direct line to Jesus.  The call was to create a people and give them salvation.  It was both a physical and spiritual call.  The line began with Isaac and went on to Moses without the Law.  Just to worship God and make sacrifices. To be fruitful and multiply.  To seek the Lord.

Humanity sank low again and Sodom went up in  nuclear splat.  Sin didn't go away then either just because the bloodline had begun

Then the Law arrived and nothing changed.  But everything changed.  WE didn't change, but we now  sin was defined.  Had we pushed pause and thought, we would have seen that we lived so long in sin we were habituated.  Our parent's were addicts and we were born that way.  In an ER,  one of the most dread moments is the desperate birth of a "crack baby"  an undernourished child who comes out screaming then spend days still screaming because the baby got addicted in the womb to the drug his mother was on and now she must withdraw because the mother refused to relent from her sin even for a second, even to spare her child.  Judgement for sin arrives in a smaller than healthful package which will have a hard, probably troubled and faulty life putting a face to the sin of the addict.  The Law brought judgement we never faced before.  Make no mistake, there was Judgement as the Flood showed, but we got a certain kind of pass because we didn't have it all down in stone.  I don't know how that gets worked out in the Final Judgement, but we will likely come to see.

The Hebrews  had freedom thrust upon them, the possibility of life in obedience because that way of obedience was laid out.  Not to live without sin, but the choice to stop sinning.  Even down to the food they were to eat.

 (Today, Nestles  is using genetic testing in Europe to help design diets that match each body's genetic  code.  We want to rewrite the Law's dietary plan to suit our corrupted genetic structure.  We miss the point that no matter how we struggle the sin corruption still goes on.)

Then they wandered for forty years because they complained and denied the plan of invasion and resisted every step of the way, God guiding them also every step of the way and them wanting more.  Wanting something else.  The taste of the world's food, the sensuous life.  The addict will resist getting clean even at the cost of death, even the death of their children.  Go back in the post and read the Scriptures.   Look at the ones who died for disobedience on the forty year trek.

Then came Joshua, directly from Moses' leadership.  Direction flowing from the Law.  Joshua led the People into battle after battle, taking the land as they went, but he passed on before the battle was complete.  he had founded the kingdom but there was still work to do.

Now we pause and become poised for the jump.   

Compare and contrast Jesus and Joshua. 

 I would do the Yeshua thing, but we end up in all manner of legalistic mess when we go there.  But we will pause to discuss the name a bit to give us an example of how humans get on these matters.  

http://yeshua.org/who/what-does-yeshua-mean/
Yeshua is a name which means ‘Salvation’ in Hebrew.
Who is Yeshua?  Yeshua is the same as Jesus Christ of the New Testament Bible, and the same as the Messiah which was prophesied to come through the Jewish people over and again in the Old Testament Bible which is known as the Tanakh to the Jews.
Why do people call Yeshua ‘Jesus’?
The name “Jesus” comes from the Latin Iesus, which comes from an Anglicized form of the Greek name Yesous. What this means  is that the Greek name Yesous was altered as it was adopted by the English language.  In the 1st century the Greek name Yesous represented the Hebrew name Yeshua, which was a shortened form of the Hebrew name Yehoshua.   Despite claims to the contrary, there is no historical or linguistic basis in any biblical texts for other modern forms of the name Yeshua, such as Yahshua, Yahushua, Yeshu, or Y’shua.  The name ‘Jesus’ did not yet exist during the the time that Jesus Christ was on Earth, approximately 4 BC to 29 or 34 AD.  It did not come into existence until it was configured by the Council of Nicea of the Roman Catholic Church in the 4th century.
“Yehoshua”
Yehoshua is a compound name consisting of two parts:
  1.  The first part is the “prefix” form of the Tetragrammaton—God’s Four-Letter Name: Yod-He-Vav-He or YHVH.In the Hebrew Bible “Yeho-” is used at the beginning of certain proper names: Jehoshaphat, Jehoiachin, Jehonathan (In Medieval English the letter “J” was pronounced as “Y”). The “suffix” form of the Tetragrammaton is “-yah” (“-iah” in Greek, as in Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah, or Halleluiah).
  2. The second part is a form of the Hebrew verb yasha which means to deliver, save, or rescue.
    Symbolically, the name Yehoshua/Yeshua/Jesus conveys the idea that God (YHVH) delivers or saves (his people).
Some have suggested that the name Yeshua can be found hidden within the tetragrammaton YHVH, as “Yeshua HaNazarei Vemelekh HaYehudim” which in Hebrew translates as, “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews” which is the same as the familiar Latin inscription  INRI seen written on the notice that was nailed to the cross above Jesus per Pontius Pilate’s instruction,  “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum”.  However, Hebrew linguists are reluctant to state that this is the case, because the word “Ha” translates as “The”, so the ‘Ha’ could be referring to anything.  Point taken, but it is interesting none the less, especially in light of what YHVH means and what Jesus said about himself.
YHVH, pronounced Yaweh, was first used in the Bible in Exodus 3:14  as the name of God when God spoke to Moses from the burning bush.  YHVH translates as “I AM THAT I  AM” or “I AM WHO I AM”.


Our nature is to argue over the meaning of a name when the person brought salvation to the world so we might live in agreement with God.  Do you see the way our sin gets to us?  Me, too, by the way, so please don't point out the way I quibble about details.  That's one of those : "I know,  I know."

Suffice it to say they have the same name, one which was common in Israel as a form of remembrance for the work of the first Joshua.  Even as the name Judas was common in Jesus' time (He had another disciple  and a (half)brother by that name) in remembrance of Judas Maccabee. 

And the name Joshua means Salvation.

Now compare and contrast...

https://unashamedworkman.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/jesus-a-better-joshua/

“There was one, then, of old, who bore this famous name of Jesus, or Joshua, and was a type of our Jesus.  What did Joshua do?
  • When Moses could not lead the people into Canaan, Joshua did it; and so our Jesus accomplishes what the law never could have done.
  • Joshua overcame the enemies of God’s people: though they were very many and very strong, and bad cities walled to heaven and chariots of iron, yet in the name of Jehovah, as captain of the Lord.s host, Joshua smote them. Even so doth our glorious Joshua smite our sins and all the powers of darkness, and utterly destroy our spiritual enemies. Before him Amalek is smitten, Jericho falls, and Canaanites are put to rout, while he giveth us to triumph in every place.
  • Moreover Joshua conquered an inheritance for Israel, took them across the Jordan, settled them in a land that flowed with milk and honey, and gave to each tribe and to each man to stand in his lot which God had ordained for him. Precisely this is what our Jesus does, only our inheritance is more divine, and on each one of us it is more surely entailed.
  • Though Joshua could not give to the people the heavenly Sabbatismos, or rest of the highest kind, yet he gave them rest most pleasant to them, so that every man sat under his own vine and fig tree, none making him afraid; but our glorious Joshua has given us infinite, eternal rest, for he is our peace, and they that know him have entered into rest.
  • Joshua, the son of Nun, caused the people to serve the Lord all his days, but he could not save the nation from their sins, for after his death they grievously went astray: our Joshua reserves to himself a people zealous for good works, for he ever liveth an is able to keep them from falling.
  • No more doth Joshua lift sword or spear on behalf of Israel, but Jesus still rideth forth, conquering and to conquer, and all his people have victory through his blood.
Well is his name called Jesus.”
(Charles Spurgeon: “Jesus” – Matthew 1:21)



We notice the comparison that Joshua conquered but there was still work to be done by the Tribes and that Jesus conquered on the cross but there is still work to be done by the Church.  We heard: "It is finished." on the cross, but we heard He was sending us on a mission when He spoke afterward. Dwell on what you learned about the tribes in judges and you will get a sense of where we are going in comparing the two beginnings of kingdoms.



Heb 4:7 After a long time, again naming a certain day, he says in David, Today (as he had said before), Today if you will let his voice come to your ears, be not hard of heart,
 8 For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have said anything about another day.
 9 So that there is still a Sabbath-keeping for the people of God.
 10 For the man who comes into his rest has had rest from his works, as God did from his.
 (BBE)

The Writer of Hebrews points out to the Hebrews that Joshua provided a temporary place of rest, one that men immediately messed up and expounds on how the new Joshua, Jesus, has become the perfect rest himself.  

Then I keep going back to Stephen, the first martyr, who did the best job of explaining the links in my own blog better than I long before I began ambling through it centuries later, did it so well it got him killed.


Acts 7:1 Then the high priest said, Are these things true?
 2 And he said, My brothers and fathers, give hearing. The God of glory came to our father Abraham, when he was in Mesopotamia, before he was living in Haran,
 3 And said to him, Go out of your land, and away from your family, and come into the land to which I will be your guide.
 4 Then he came out of the land of the Chaldaeans, and went into Haran; and from there, when his father was dead, he was guided by God into this land, where you are living now:
 5 And God gave him no heritage in it, not even enough to put his foot on: but he gave him an undertaking that he would give it to him and to his children after him, though he had no child at that time.
 6 And God said that his seed would be living in a strange land, and that they would make them servants, and be cruel to them for four hundred years.
 7 And I will be the judge, said God, of that nation which made them servants: and after that, they will come out and give me worship in this place.
 8 And he made with him the agreement of which circumcision was the sign. And so Abraham had a son, Isaac, and gave him circumcision on the eighth day; and Isaac had a son, Jacob, and Jacob was the father of the twelve heads of the families of Israel.
 9 And the brothers, moved with envy against Joseph, gave him to the Egyptians for money: but God was with him,
 10 And made him free from all his troubles, and gave him wisdom and the approval of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, who made him ruler over Egypt and all his house.
 11 Now there was no food to be had in all Egypt and Canaan, and there was great trouble: and our fathers were not able to get food.
 12 But Jacob, hearing that there was grain in Egypt, sent out our fathers the first time.
 13 And the second time his brothers had a meeting with Joseph, and Pharaoh had knowledge of Joseph's family.
 14 Then Joseph sent for Jacob his father and all his family, seventy-five persons.
 15 And Jacob went down to Egypt, and came to his end there, and so did our fathers;
 16 And they were taken over to Shechem, and put to rest in the place which Abraham got for a price in silver from the sons of Hamor in Shechem.
 17 But when the time was near for putting into effect the undertaking which God had given to Abraham, the people were increasing in Egypt,
 18 Till another king came to power, who had no knowledge of Joseph.
 19 He, having evil designs against our nation, was cruel to our fathers, and they were forced to put out their young children, so that they might not go on living.
 20 At which time Moses came to birth, and he was very beautiful; and he was kept for three months in his father's house:
 21 And when he was put out, Pharaoh's daughter took him and kept him as her son.
 22 And Moses was trained in all the wisdom of Egypt, and was great in his words and works.
 23 But when he was almost forty years old, it came into his heart to go and see his brothers, the children of Israel.
 24 And seeing one of them being attacked, he went to his help and gave the Egyptian a death-blow:
 25 And he was hoping that his brothers would see that God had sent him to be their saviour; but they did not see.
 26 And the day after, he came to them, while they were having a fight, and would have made peace between them, saying, Sirs, you are brothers; why do you do wrong to one another?
 27 But the man who was doing wrong to his neighbour, pushing him away, said, Who made you a ruler and a judge over us?
 28 Will you put me to death as you did the Egyptian yesterday?
 29 And at these words, Moses went in flight to the land of Midian, and was living there for a time, and had two sons.
 30 At the end of forty years, an angel came to him in the waste land of Sinai, in the flame of a burning thorn-tree.
 31 And Moses, seeing it, was full of wonder, and when he came up to have a nearer view of it, the voice of the Lord came to him, saying,
 32 I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and of Isaac and of Jacob. And Moses, shaking with fear, kept his eyes from looking at it.
 33 And the Lord said, Take off the shoes from your feet, for the place where you are is holy.
 34 Truly, I have seen the sorrows of my people in Egypt, and their cries have come to my ears, and I have come down to make them free: and now, come, I will send you to Egypt.
 35 This Moses, whom they would not have, saying, Who made you a ruler and a judge? him God sent to be a ruler and a saviour, by the hand of the angel whom he saw in the thorn-tree.
 36 This man took them out, having done wonders and signs in Egypt and in the Red Sea and in the waste land, for forty years.
 37 This is the same Moses, who said to the children of Israel, God will give you a prophet from among your brothers, like me.
 38 This is the man who was in the church in the waste land with the angel who was talking to him in Sinai, and with our fathers; and to him were given the living words of God, so that he might give them to you.
 39 By whom our fathers would not be controlled; but they put him on one side, turning back in their hearts to Egypt,
 40 And saying to Aaron, Make us gods to go before us: as for this Moses, who took us out of the land of Egypt, we have no idea what has become of him.
 41 And they made the image of a young ox in those days, and made an offering to it, and had joy in the work of their hands.
 42 But God was turned from them and let them give worship to the stars of heaven, as it says in the book of the prophets, Did you make offerings to me of sheep and oxen for forty years in the waste land, O house of Israel?
 43 And you took up the tent of Moloch and the star of the god Rephan, images which you made to give worship to them: and I will take you away, farther than Babylon.
 44 Our fathers had the Tent of witness in the waste land, as God gave orders to Moses to make it after the design which he had seen.
 45 Which our fathers, in their turn, took with them when, with Joshua, they came into the heritage of the nations whom God was driving out before the face of our fathers, till the time of David,
 46 Who was pleasing to God; and he had a desire to make a holy tent for the God of Jacob.
 47 But Solomon was the builder of his house.
 48 But still, the Most High has not his resting-place in houses made with hands, as the prophet says,
 49 Heaven is the seat of my power, and earth is a resting-place for my feet: what sort of house will you make for me, says the Lord, or what is my place of rest?
 50 Did not my hand make all these things?
 51 You whose hearts are hard and whose ears are shut to me; you are ever working against the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you.
 52 Which of the prophets was not cruelly attacked by your fathers? and they put to death those who gave them the news of the coming of the Upright One; whom you have now given up and put to death;
 53 You, to whom the law was given as it was ordered by angels, and who have not kept it.
 54 Hearing these things, they were cut to the heart and moved with wrath against him.
 (BBE)


Stephen knew that EVERY forefather in someway foreshadowed Christ.   He knew too the meaning of  the statement on 37 and 38:


 37 This is the same Moses, who said to the children of Israel, God will give you a prophet from among your brothers, like me.

 38 This is the man who was in the church in the waste land with the angel who was talking to him in Sinai, and with our fathers; and to him (i.e.,Moses) were given the living words of God, so that he might give them to you.

Surely at that time the people thought he meant that Joshua. and he meant physically that Joshua, but the Second  Joshua, the Prophet and the Messiah, the second Adam, the spiritual Joshua was also spoken of in that message.

As Joshua ushered in the age of Judges, as he started  the building of the Kingdom on Earth so does the Spiritual Joshua usher in the Church Age, the start of the heavenly part of the Kingdom.    We will trace the corresponding developments as we proceed.  And as the Second Joshua brings Spiritual renewal, so the Second Adam begins the bodily renewal, the personal physical renewal.  Enter the Refreshed Flesh.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

                                                                              XI.

                                                      When God Smoked a Ziggurat 


Ge 11:1 And all the earth had one language and one tongue.
 2 And it came about that in their wandering from the east, they came to a stretch of flat country in the land of Shinar, and there they made their living-place.
 3 And they said one to another, Come, let us make bricks, burning them well. And they had bricks for stone, putting them together with sticky earth.
 4 And they said, Come, let us make a town, and a tower whose top will go up as high as heaven; and let us make a great name for ourselves, so that we may not be wanderers over the face of the earth.
 5 And the Lord came down to see the town and the tower which the children of men were building.
 6 And the Lord said, See, they are all one people and have all one language; and this is only the start of what they may do: and now it will not be possible to keep them from any purpose of theirs.
 7 Come, let us go down and take away the sense of their language, so that they will not be able to make themselves clear to one another.
 8 So the Lord God sent them away into every part of the earth: and they gave up building their town.
 9 So it was named Babel, because there the Lord took away the sense of all languages and from there the Lord sent them away over all the face of the earth.

 (BBE)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRwe6gvL-I8


zig·gu·rat
ˈziɡəˌrat/
noun
  1. (in ancient Mesopotamia) a rectangular stepped tower, sometimes surmounted by a temple. Ziggurats are first attested in the late 3rd millennium BC and probably inspired the Biblical story of the Tower of Babel (Gen. 11:1–9).



Years ago, Cornelius Ryan wrote a book about the Battle of the Bulge called "A Bridge Too Far" about how one portion of the Allied Army pushed too far ahead in the fighting in Germany and the Germans started a run with their tanks to cut that portion off from the rest of the forces.  That ended in  failure.

Nimrod's forces or some remnant of that united front forged into the area that would become Babylon, perhaps pursuing Eden which had been in that area but  must have vanished with the Flood.  Instead, they found the muddy wetland. apparently farther than they had gone before.  A land too far and too far past the limit of God's willingness to permit what they proceeded to do.


Matt Henry:


 INTRODUCTION TO GENESIS CHAPTER 11

The old distinction between the sons of God and the sons of men (professors and profane) survived the flood, and now appeared again, when men began to multiply: according to this distinction we have, in this chapter,

 I. The dispersion of the sons of men at Babel, Ge 11:1-9, where we have,

1. Their presumptuous provoking design, which was to build a city and a tower, Ge 11:1-4.

2. The righteous judgment of God upon them in disappointing their design, by confounding their language, and so scattering them, Ge 11:5-9.

 II. The pedigree of the sons of God down to Abraham (Ge 11:10-26), with a general account of his family, and removal out of his native country, Ge 11:27-32.

Ver. 1.

The close of the foregoing chapter tells us that by the sons of Noah, or among the sons of Noah, the nations were divided in the earth after the flood, that is, were distinguished into several tribes or colonies; and, the places having grown too strait for them, it was either appointed by Noah, or agreed upon among his sons, which way each several tribe or colony should steer its course, beginning with the countries that were next them, and designing to proceed further and further, and to remove to a greater distance from each other, as the increase of their several companies should require. Thus was the matter well settled, one hundred years after the flood, about the time of Peleg's birth; but the sons of men, it should seem, were loath to disperse into distant places; they thought the more the merrier and the safer, and therefore they contrived to keep together, and were slack to go to possess the land which the Lord God of their fathers had given them (Jos 18:3), thinking themselves wiser than either God or Noah. Now here we have,

 I. The advantages which befriended their design of keeping together,

1. They were all of one language, Ge 11:1. If there were any different languages before the flood, yet Noah's only, which it is likely was the same with Adam's, was preserved through the flood, and continued after it. Now, while they all understood one another, they would be the more likely to love one another, and the more capable of helping one another, and the less inclinable to separate one from another.

2. They found a very convenient commodious place to settle in (Ge 11:2), a plain in the land of Shinar, a spacious plain, able to contain them all, and a fruitful plain, able, according as their present numbers were, to support them all, though perhaps they had not considered what room there would be for them when their numbers should be increased. Note, Inviting accommodations, for the present, often prove too strong temptations to the neglect of both duty and interest, as it respects futurity.

 II. The method they took to bind themselves to one another, and to settle together in one body. Instead of coveting to enlarge their borders by a peaceful departure under the divine protection, they contrived to fortify them, and, as those that were resolved to wage war with Heaven, they put themselves into a posture of defense. Their unanimous resolution is, Let us build ourselves a city and a tower. It is observable that the first builders of cities, both in the old world (Ge 4:17), and in the new world here, were not men of the best character and reputation: tents served God's subjects to dwell in; cities were first built by those that were rebels against him and revolters from him. Observe here,

1. How they excited and encouraged one another to set about this work. They said, Go to, let us make brick (Ge 11:3), and again, (Ge 11:4), Go to, let us build ourselves a city; by mutual excitements they made one another more daring and resolute. Note, Great things may be brought to pass when the undertakers are numerous and unanimous, and stir up one another. Let us learn to provoke one another to love and to good works, as sinners stir up and encourage one another to wicked works. See Ps 122:1; Isa 2:3,5; Jer 50:5.

2. What materials they used in their building. The country, being plain, yielded neither stone nor mortar, yet this did not discourage them from their undertaking, but they made brick to serve instead of stone, and slime or pitch instead of mortar. See here,

(1.) What shift those will make that are resolute in their purposes: were we but zealously affected in a good thing, we should not stop our work so often as we do, under pretence that we want conveniences for carrying it on.

(2.) What a difference there is between men's building and God's; when men build their Babel, brick and slime are their best materials; but, when God builds his Jerusalem, he lays even the foundations of it with sapphires, and all its borders with pleasant stones, Isa 54:11-12; Re 21:19.

3. For what ends they built. Some think they intended hereby to secure themselves against the waters of another flood. God had told them indeed that he would not again drown the world; but they would trust to a tower of their own making, rather than to a promise of God's making or an ark of his appointing. If, however, they had had this in their eye, they would have chosen to build their tower upon a mountain rather than upon a plain, but three things, it seems, they aimed at in building this tower:--

(1.) It seems designed for an affront to God himself; for they would build a tower whose top might reach to heaven, which bespeaks a defiance of God, or at least a rivalry with him. They would be like the Most High, or would come as near him as they could, not in holiness but in height. They forgot their place, and, scorning to creep on the earth, resolved to climb to heaven, not by the door or ladder, but some other way.

(2.) They hoped hereby to make themselves a name; they would do something to be talked of now, and to give posterity to know that there had been such men as they in the world. Rather than die and leave no memorandum behind them, they would leave this monument of their pride, and ambition, and folly. Note,

[1.] Affectation of honor and a name among men commonly inspires with a strange ardor for great and difficult undertakings, and often betrays to that which is evil and offensive to God.

[2.] It is just with God to bury those names in the dust which are raised by sin. These Babel-builders put themselves to a great deal of foolish expense to make themselves a name; but they could not gain even this point, for we do not find in any history the name of so much as one of these Babel-builders. Philo Judaeus says, They engraved every one his name upon a brick, in perpetuam rei memoriam--as a perpetual memorial; yet neither did this serve their purpose. 

(3.) They did it to prevent their dispersion: Lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the earth. 

"It was done" (says Josephus) "in disobedience to that command (Ge 9:1), Replenish the earth." 

God orders them to disperse. 

"No," say they, "we will not, we will live and die together."

In order hereunto, they engage themselves and one another in this vast undertaking. That they might unite in one glorious empire, they resolve to build this city and tower, to be the metropolis of their kingdom and the centre of their unity. It is probable that the band of ambitious Nimrod was in all this. He could not content himself with the command of a particular colony, but aimed at universal monarchy, in order to which, under pretence of uniting for their common safety, he contrives to keep them in one body, that, having them all under his eye, he might not fail to have them under his power. See the daring presumption of these sinners. Here is, 

[1.] A bold opposition to God:

"You shall be scattered," says God.

"But we will not," say they.

 Woe unto him that thus strives with his maker.

[2.] A bold competition with God. It is God's prerogative to be universal monarch, Lord of all, and King of kings; the man that aims at it offers to step into the throne of God, who will not give his glory to another.



Recall we mentioned Nimrod seems to have melded the old gods with the goddess system so both could be worshiped and people could be unified.  That new religion now finds a home in a tower with a temple on top.  The purpose was worship, but also a study of the heavens, where the gods might reside.  Hence astrology began around this time, too.  One god/goddess from that time rings very familiar to us today:


Nanna/Suen/Sin (god)

Mesopotamian moon god. He was called Nanna in Sumerian, and Su'en or Sin in Akkadian. 

Functions


.
The ziggurat TT , or temple tower, of Nanna at Ur. It was built by king Ur-Namma of Ur (r. about 2112-2095 BCE), the founder of the Ur III dynasty. The monumental temple tower is built of solid bricks. © Penn Museum.
The primary symbol of the moon god was as a bull, the result of the horizontal crescent of the waxing moon appearing similar to the horns of that animal. This symbolism led to a consideration of the moon god as a cowherd, which is celebrated most clearly in the composition The Herds of Nanna (ETCSL 4.13.06), the longest section of which enumerates the cattle in Nanna's herd.
The moon god was the tutelary deity of the city of Ur.

(A little further on the Bible tells us that Abram came from Ur.  That "sin" 
was chosen as the name for all evil doings says a lot about the nature of worship for this god. W)

His reach and importance, however, was far greater than just a city god, the moon god is clearly one of the most important deities in the wider pantheon of Mesopotamia. In the Early Dynastic god lists, such as Fara SF 1, the moon god appears immediately after the four leading gods An, Enlil, Inana and Enki (Klein 2001: 290, and this important, albeit slightly junior position, is confirmed in the text Nanna-Suen's Journey to Nippur (ETCSL 1.5.1: 18), when Nanna brings the "first fruit offerings" to Enlil, the head of the early Mesopotamian pantheon (Black et al. 2004: 147)An association with fertility may come from the moon god's connection to cattle, and also, perhaps, from the clear link to the menstrual cycle, roughly similar to the timing of the moon's transformations. The connection with fertility is demonstrated in the Old Babylonian (early second-millennium) birth incantations (Krebernik 1993-98b: 367; Veldhuis 1991). The magical-medical text A Cow of Sin relates the story of the moon god's beautiful and pregnant cow, Geme-Sin. The birthing-pains of Geme-Sin are eased by Sin, and the incantation ends with a 'supplication: "may this woman give birth as easily as Geme-Sin" suggesting this text's role in human child-birth (Veldhuis 19911).
Other literature makes much of the moon as an astronomical feature. The deity is referred to in terms characteristic of the celestial body, e.g., radiant, shining, and much is made of the moon's path and cycle, which were also keenly observed for omens of the future, for example in the first-millennium series šumma Sin ina tāmartišu, "If the moon at its appearance" (Hunger and Pingree 1999: 21 ff.).

The Akkadian literature evokes some of the other functions of the moon god. A prayer to Su'en details his role in divination (Foster 2005: 758-9). No doubt this divinatory role was also connected to the moon god's ability to illuminate darkness (Foster 2005: 760-1). Both the moon god and the sun god are praised together in a further text in which they are associated with issuing laws and verdicts, the determination of destinies, and the announcements of omens (Foster 2005: 762). This judicial role was already obvious in the text of the Early Dynastic 'Stele of the Vultures', where oaths are taken in the presence of Su'en, and in his epithet "diviner of fates", which is used across the Near East (Krebernik 1993-98b: 367).

The earliest attestation of this name dates back to the very beginning of written documentations. In personal names the moon god is attested from the Late Uruk period until the very end of the cuneiform tradition. Not only is he frequently attested in personal names, a testimony to personal piety, he is also frequently invoked in royal names from the earlier to the late periods, for example: Naram-Sin (Old Akkadian); Amar-Su'en, Šu-Sin, Ibbi-Sin (all Ur III) Sin-iddinam (Old Babylonian), Sennacherib (Akkadian: Sin-ahhe-eruba - from the Neo Assyrian period) (Cohen 1996: 9; Krebernik 1993-98b: 360; Hall 1985: 56-91).
The moon god is most frequently represented by his symbol, the crescent moon (Sumerian u4-sakar, Akkadian u/ašqāru). This iconography is already known form Early Dynastic seals, and continues throughout Mesopotamian history and across the Ancient Near East. The crescent shape had an impact on other symbols which came to be associated with Nanna/Suen, primarily the moon god's association with the bull (Krebernik 1993-98b: 360). Additionally, Nanna/Su'en is often attested in connection with a boat. Other iconographic symbols include a rather enigmatic tripod, and it is now thought that many of the motifs once thought to be solely associated with the sun god - such as rays, gates and a god-figure rising between mountains, might now also be considered iconographic characteristics of the moon god. Such similarities should not be surprising given that the moon provided the light of the night-time, as the sun did for the day (Krebernik 1993-98b: 374-7).

This matters to us for two reasons.

First, our current suggestion that the gods and goddesses were combined.

The Moon Goddess is an important deity in many cultures around the world where they form a central role in mythology. 
The moon is associated with the divine feminine as in many tribal societies the feminine cycles were linked to the phases of the moon.
Not all the lunar deities were female Chandra is the God of the moon in Hinduism and Mani the Germanic moon gods are to examples of this. 
The Moon was important in ancient calendars, helping people to measure time and to determine when the best time was for planting and harvesting crops. This fertility aspect of the lunar Goddess is reflected in large numbers of the entries below.
The moon and the stars were also a way that the ancient people navigated the land and seas.
Many of the lunar Goddesses like Hecate and Cerridwen, are also associated with magic and the intuitive nature of women.

The lunar deities are also very important archetypes in the modern pagan movement and Wicca. 
(Note:  This being a new age wiccan site, I won't include a link and will  point out she missed the most obvious male moon deity.  I include an interesting partial list of moon goddesses. W)

Selene (Greek) - A mother Goddess linked to the full moon. She is widely worshipped by Pagans today.
Sina (Polynesian) - This moon Goddess was the sister of the sun God Maui. She was sometimes called Ina.
Teczistecatl (Aztec) - A Goddess of sex, symbolised by the four phases of the moon: dark, waxing, full, and waning.
Trivia (Roman) - She is the equivalent Goddess to Selene in Roman mythology.

Xochhiquetzal (Aztec) - This magical moon Goddess was the deity of flowers, spring, sex, love, and marriage. She was the wife of storm God Tlaloc. She is also the patroness of artisans, prostitutes, pregnant women and birth.
The moon seems to be the "hinge" of the door shutting and opening on goddess worship.  When we see a moon god men seem to have taken over in the hunting tradition and women seem to have lost their voice in the culture.  When the moon is a goddess, the area has become more urban, less masculine dominated, more agrarian, women seem to have a stronger usually sexual role in the society.

The second reason this strikes us is this:


Updated March 11, 2016.
The crescent moon and star is an internationally-recognized symbol of Islam. The symbol is featured on the flags of several Muslim countries, and is even part of the official emblem for theInternational Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. The Christians have the cross, the Jews have the star of David, and the Muslims have the crescent moon, right?

Pre-Islamic Symbol

The crescent moon and star symbol actually pre-dates Islam by several thousand years. Information on the origins of the symbol are difficult to confirm, but most sources agree that these ancient celestial symbols were in use by the peoples of Central Asia and Siberia in their worship of sun, moon, and sky gods. There are also reports that the crescent moon and star were used to represent the Carthaginian goddess Tanit or the Greek goddess Diana.
Robert Morley reports Allah as a mood god while Islam sources claim the moon symbol came about on the flag through the Ottoman empire.  Either way, that crescent shape that was fixed in paganism now has a home in Islam.
Ziggurats themselves have an interesting history most of it known for Herodotus' history:

 According to Herodotus, at the top of each ziggurat was a shrine, although none of these shrines have survived.[1] One practical function of the ziggurats was a high place on which the priests could escape rising water that annually inundated lowlands and occasionally flooded for hundreds of miles, for example the 1967 flood.[5] Another practical function of the ziggurat was for security. Since the shrine was accessible only by way of three stairways,[6] a small number of guards could prevent non-priests from spying on the rituals at the shrine on top of the ziggurat, such as initiation rituals such as the Eleusinian mysteries, cooking of sacrificial food and burning of carcasses of sacrificial animals. Each ziggurat was part of a temple complex that included a courtyard, storage rooms, bathrooms, and living quarters, around which a city was built.

According to http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2008/05/Is-there-Archaeological-Evidence-for-the-Tower-of-Babel.aspx   ziggurats were designed as homes away from home for the gods or the city god.  They were set up with food and resting places for a visiting god as well as access to various other human amenities with the top level reserved for viewing the heavens and providing a gateway to heaven.  Research proves the building materials used were exactly as described in 11;3.  These materials were used for either government or religious buildings which were grouped together in Mesopotamian cities. Again a hint at the mixture of government and religion under the god-king pattern.  Since the Osirus myth suggested Nimrod died and came to visit his wife and impregnate her, this also ushers in the notion of temple prostitutes and Vestal Virgins keeping themselves pure for the gods.    C.J. Gadd suggested "the distinction between city and temple becomes dim" pointing out that the area built as Babel may well have been the public and temple  building with much more temporary dwelling around the structure.  this was only made possible by the centralization of power.  The god-king and his military force gave the temple complete rights in land ownership and power over the people who lived in the city area.

The article cites Jacobsen as noting urbanization went hand-in-hand with the rise of  "humanized" gods.  Genesis implies it in the first urbanization prior to the Flood and then underscores it with Nimrod. 

And with it came the building of statues to those humanized gods.

"The development in Mesopotamian religion that took place with the development of urbanization was that men began to envision their gods in conformity with the image of man.  Man was no longer attempting to be like God, but, more insidiously, was trying to bring deity down to the level of man."
John H. Walton, author of the above article  who also concludes:  "This goes beyond mere idolatry: it degrades the very nature of God."

One other thing may have been associated with these pyramids as it was with the Aztec step pyramids in Mesoamerica:

  Sacrifice was a common theme in Mesoamerican cultures. In the Aztec "Legend of the Five Suns", all the gods sacrificed themselves so that mankind could live. Some years after the Spanish conquest of Mexico, a body of Franciscans confronted the remaining Aztec priesthood and demanded, under threat of death, that they desist from this traditional practice. The Aztec priests defended themselves as follows:
Life is because of the gods; with their sacrifice they gave us life.... They produce our sustenance... which nourishes life.[8]
What the Aztec priests were referring to was a central Mesoamerican belief: that a great, continuing sacrifice of the gods sustains the Universe. Everything on earth is tonacayotl - "spiritual flesh-hood". All things—earth, crops, moon, stars and people—springs from the severed or buried bodies, fingers, blood or the heads of the sacrificed gods. Humanity itself is macehualli, "those deserved and brought back to life through penance".[9] A strong sense of indebtedness was connected with this worldview. Indeed, nextlahualli (debt-payment) was a commonly used metaphor for human sacrifice, and, as Bernardino de Sahagún reported, it was said that the victim was someone who "gave his service".
Human sacrifice was in this sense the highest level of an entire panoply of offerings through which the Aztecs sought to repay their debt to the gods. Both Sahagún and Toribio de Benavente (also called "Motolinía") observed that the Aztecs gladly parted with everything: burying, smashing, sinking, slaying vast quantities of quail, rabbits, dogs, feathers, flowers, insects, beans, grains, paper, rubber and treasures as sacrifices. Even the "stage" for human sacrifice, the massive temple-pyramids, was an offering mound: crammed with treasures, grains, soil and human and animal sacrifices that were buried as gifts to the deities. Adorned with the land's finest art, treasure and victims, these temples became buried offerings under new structures every half a century.

We don't know that human sacrifice was made on the Tower of Babel. but that would also have been the ultimate destruction of the image of God: man.  And that would have pleased the serpent as  much as it would have angered God.  

Many commentaries, like Henry's,  see the resistance to God's command to scatter as the cause for His anger, but the nature of the temple itself seems a logical reason.  Some blend of both may have played a roles, though we have to recall the very first Commandment is "You shall have  no other gods before me" and the second, "You shall make no idols.  No craven image."  

In The Origin of Consciousness in The Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind,  Julian Jaynes who was listed with an English degree when I first read the book twenty years ago, a degree which influenced his theory since he noted the story telling style vastly differed between the Iliad, more dreamy with the gods and goddesses everywhere, and the Odyssey, with Ulysses always the logical man fighting the influence of gods and men influenced by them,  but is now listed as a psychologist, wrote a book on the following premise:


At the heart of this book is the revolutionary idea that human consciousness did not begin far back in animal evolution but is a learned process brought into being out of an earlier hallucinatory mentality by cataclysm and catastrophe only 3000 years ago and still developing. The implications of this new scientific paradigm extend into virtually every aspect of our psychology, our history and culture, our religion - and indeed, our future. In the words of one reviewer, it is "a humbling text, the kind that reminds most of us who make our livings through thinking, how much thinking there is left to do."
*    *    *
Presents a theory of the bicameral mind which holds that ancient peoples could not "think" as we do today and were therefore "unconscious," a result of the domination of the right hemisphere; only catastrophe forced mankind to "learn" consciousness, a product of human history and culture and one that issues from the brain's left hemisphere. Three forms of human awareness, the bicameral or god-run man; the modern or problem-solving man; and contemporary forms of throwbacks to bicamerality (e.g., religious frenzy, hypnotism, and schizophrenia) are examined in terms of the physiology of the brain and how it applies to human psychology, culture, and history.
*    *    *

— excerpt from the Introduction to The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind

Jaynes notes a marked change in literature, in the recorded human view of gods,  once actively talking to humanity, they suddenly vanish into humanized forms that never seem to ha ve  uch to do with humanity except by disasters and monsters created for the gods and goddesses to get their way.  .  They become a thing of the past, recalled vaguely.  Worshiped because of coincidence: someone prays to a specific god for something to happen.  It does and so the god has power for a time.  

For his disaster, Jaynes even suggested an Atlantis scenario for Crete nd nearby civilizations due to the Thera explosion:


The Minoan eruption of Thera, also referred to as the Thera eruption or Santorini eruption, was a major catastrophic volcaniceruption with a Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) of 6 or 7 and a dense-rock equivalent (DRE) of 60 km3 (14 cu mi),[1][2] Dated to the mid-second millennium BCE,[3] the eruption was one of the largest volcanic events on Earth in recorded history.[4][5][6] It devastated the island of Thera (now called Santorini), including the Minoan settlement at Akrotiri and communities and agricultural areas on nearby islands and the coast of Crete with a related earthquake or tsunami.
There are no clear ancient records of the eruption, which may have inspired certain Greek myths,[7] caused turmoil in Egypt[8][9] and be alluded to in a Chinese chronicle.

Or, if you're of a mind may have resulted in a monumental localized flooding.  But about jaynes theory:

Myth: The Thera explosion and resulting tsunamis around 1600 B.C. could not have caused the mass migrations and social disruption in the Mediterranean Jaynes describes.
Fact: Recent investigations have revealed that the Thera explosion and resulting tsunamis had a much more devastating impact on the Mediterranean than was previously known, wiping out coastal communities and causing a period of widespread unrest. The Thera explosion is now believed to be ten times more powerful than the Krakatoa eruption in 1883, which killed 36,000 in Indonesia from the initial eruption and resulting tsunamis. "The destructive force was incomprehensible. ... A search turns up Theran ash 500 miles away in the Black Sea. ... We really are talking about the largest volcanic event in human history in Europe" ("Sinking Atlantis," PBS Home Video, 2008).
Sea floor deposits found inland and high above sea level along with building damage patterns suggest a massive tsunami triggered by the Thera explosion hit Crete and nearly wiped out the coastal Minoan civilization. The initial wave that hit Crete was at least thirty miles wide and followed by several other waves at intervals of 30–45 minutes. See "Sinking Atlantis" (Secrets of the Dead Series), PBS Home Video, 2008.
The series of tsunamis that hit Sumatra, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and other countries in December 2004 provide a modern example of the devastating impact of large tsunamis. The tsunamis, triggered by a magnitude 9.1 earthquake in the Indian Ocean, killed more than 225,000 people in 11 countries. Coastal communities were hit with waves up to 100 feet high. It is believed the tsunami following the Thera explosion was of a similar magnitude.
A related misconception is that Jaynes argues the Thera explosion somehow "caused" the emergence of consciousness. Jaynes argues the shift to consciousness was the result of a number of factors including complex metaphorical language and writing. The mass migrations and social disruption following the Thera explosion may have contributed to the process in the Mediterranean. Different cultures developed consciousness at different times in other parts of the world.

Having read the book, I can say Jaynes heavily emphasizes the explosion as the point of emergence.  But the point he makes is based on the change in language, suggesting language change alters  consciousness whereas consciousness supposedly alters  language in current reasoning.

All if this seems so much gibberish until we deduce what Jaynes actually may have detected was proof of Babel.  We;ve seen major traumas throughout history and certainly ones effected mankind BEFORE Thera.  But if God blew up Thera to destroy the Tower and the nearby civilizations even as He changed language,  then there would be a positive association between the two events and an unsaved mind would logically deduce the one event caused the other, Eruption=language change, whereas they were merely both events that occurred at the same time related by God's wrath.  Jaynes may well have found the only kind of evidence of the change that can be found and, since 1976 and the publication of the book, that evidence has laid open to the public wrapped in misinterpretation.   

At the least, it attests to a much later change in character of language than was and has been noted as fact.

From here, we go to a summation, then the post-law phase of our Fallen Flesh.

(Note:  since an earlier blog, I have changed my idea concerning the origin of the nephilim  and am going back to edit that posting.  Then I am working on getting my blog Your True Life Now translated into several other languages after I reedit.  I will restart this blog in four weeks,  Thnaks for reading and hope you return,  W)